Australian consumers only : USA & World enquires & information visit spicoatings.com - Authorised Australian & New Zealand Distributor

Fire Ratings and Thermal Coatings

Cool Surfaces | Environmental | Insulation Coatings | Sustainability | Thermal Info

What Actually Matters When Heat and Flame Are Involved

Fire performance is one of the most misunderstood parts of building materials.

A product can claim to be “fire resistant,” “non-combustible,” or “Class A rated” — yet behave very differently once installed on a steel roof, wall, pipe or modular building. The language sounds reassuring. The science is often more complex.

If you work in defence, mining, energy, transportables or government infrastructure, you cannot afford to rely on marketing phrases. You need to understand what the fire rating actually measures.

Let’s break it down.

The Problem: Fire Ratings Don’t Always Mean What You Think

Most fire ratings focus on surface flame spread, not heat transfer.

A common example is ASTM E84, often called the Steiner Tunnel Test. It measures flame spread index and smoke development when a material is exposed to controlled flame in a horizontal tunnel. It does not measure how much heat passes through the material. It does not measure structural performance. It does not measure internal temperature rise.

In other words, it tells you how the surface burns, not how the system behaves under real thermal load.

Similarly, AS 1530 testing in Australia assesses different fire performance parameters depending on the part of the standard used. Some parts measure combustibility. Others measure spread of flame or heat release. Each test answers a specific question. None of them alone describe complete fire resilience.

That distinction matters.

A coating that resists flame spread is not automatically a thermal barrier.
A thermal barrier is not automatically non-combustible.
A corrosion coating is not automatically fire rated.

You must separate the functions.

The Science: Flame Spread vs Heat Transfer vs Structural Protection

When we talk about fire and thermal coatings, we are really discussing three different performance dimensions:

1. Flame Spread Behaviour

How quickly fire travels across a surface.

Measured by:

  • ASTM E84
  • UL 723
  • AS 1530.3

This determines classification such as Class A, B or C under certain standards.

2. Combustibility

Whether the material itself contributes fuel to the fire.

Measured by:

  • AS 1530.1
  • ISO 1182

Non-combustible materials do not sustain combustion under test conditions.

3. Heat Transfer Resistance

How much heat moves through the material.

Measured by:

  • ASTM E1269
  • ASTM E1461
  • ISO 22007

This is where most insulation coatings differ from traditional paint systems. Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity determine how fast heat energy penetrates a surface.

Fire is not just flame. It is heat flux.

A coating with low thermal diffusivity slows the rate of temperature rise in the substrate. That delay can be critical in steel structures, pipe systems and modular buildings.

Intumescent Coatings vs Thermal Ceramic Coatings

It is important to understand the difference.

Intumescent coatings are designed to expand under extreme heat, forming a char layer that insulates steel during a fire event. They are reactive systems activated at high temperatures, typically above 200°C.

They are engineered for structural fire protection compliance.

Thermal ceramic coatings, by contrast, are designed to block or manage radiant heat load under normal operating conditions. They are not primarily designed to expand in fire. They are designed to reduce surface temperature gain and slow heat transfer.

That difference is critical in infrastructure design.

If your objective is:

  • Protect structural steel during a certified fire event → intumescent is appropriate.
  • Reduce solar heat load on roofs, containers or pipework → thermal ceramic insulation coatings are appropriate.
  • Manage corrosion under insulation and surface temperature → specialist closed-cell systems apply.

Conflating the two leads to incorrect specification.

Real-World Risk: Steel, Heat Flux and Thermal Lag

Steel loses approximately 50 percent of its strength at around 550°C. That temperature can be reached quickly in uncontrolled fire conditions.

But most overheating in Australia does not start with fire. It starts with solar radiation.

Roofs, tanks and modular structures absorb solar infrared energy all day. Surface temperatures can exceed 70°C to 80°C in summer. That heat migrates inward, increasing internal load and raising background structural temperatures.

Managing that heat load reduces the thermal stress before any fire event occurs.

Surface heat control is not a fire rating issue. It is a resilience issue.

Where Thermal Coatings Fit

Advanced multi-ceramic insulation coatings such as Super Therm® are engineered to reduce radiant heat absorption and slow thermal transfer through low conductivity and low diffusivity behaviour. They are applied at thin dry film thicknesses, typically 250 microns.

They are not marketed as structural intumescent fireproofing. They are surface heat-blocking systems that reduce temperature rise under solar load and moderate substrate heating.

That distinction matters in specification.

If a coating:

  • Reflects UV and visible light
  • Blocks infrared radiation
  • Slows thermal penetration

Then it reduces the starting temperature before any fire event occurs. Lower starting temperature means lower thermal stress on structure and HVAC systems.

Fire performance and thermal management are connected, but they are not identical disciplines.

Compliance vs Performance

Many specifications focus purely on achieving a minimum fire classification to satisfy code.

That is necessary.

But code compliance is the floor, not the ceiling.

If a product meets Class A flame spread but allows rapid heat transfer, you may still face overheating risk, increased HVAC load, condensation cycling, and material fatigue.

Thermal coatings must be evaluated on:

  • Flame spread rating
  • Combustibility
  • Thermal conductivity
  • Thermal diffusivity
  • Long-term durability
  • Adhesion performance

Anything less is incomplete engineering.

Final Position

Fire ratings are essential.
But they are only one part of surface science.

If you want resilient infrastructure in 40°C climates, you need to manage radiant heat, not just flame behaviour.

Separate marketing language from test methodology.
Separate compliance from physics.
Specify based on performance data, not product category.

That is how you reduce risk.


References

Super Therm® Testing and Results
https://neotechcoatings.com/super-therm-testing-and-results/

ASTM E84 Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials
https://www.astm.org/e0084-23.html

AS 1530 Methods for Fire Tests on Building Materials, Components and Structures
https://www.standards.org.au/standards-catalogue/sa-snz/building/bd-006


Looking to join one of the world’s leading coatings companies. Contact us if you’re a quality applicator looking for new products and markets!