Australian consumers only : USA & World enquires & information visit spicoatings.com - Authorised Australian & New Zealand Distributor

The Case for Including Thermal Diffusivity in Energy Modelling

Cool Surfaces | Environmental | Industry | Insulation Coatings | Passive House | Sustainability | Thermal Info | Urban Heat

We are still modelling buildings like heat moves slowly and predictably. It doesn’t.

In Australia and similar climates, the real problem is not winter heat loss. It is rapid solar heat gain, surface temperature spikes, and the knock-on effect this has on internal load and energy demand. Yet most energy models still lean heavily on R-values and conductivity, which were built for steady-state conditions.

That’s not how roofs and walls behave under the sun.

If we want models that reflect reality, thermal diffusivity needs to be part of the conversation.

The Problem with Current Thinking

R-values tell you how much heat moves through a material under stable conditions once loaded. They say nothing about how fast a surface heats up when hit with solar radiation.

Solar load is dynamic. Around 53% of solar energy sits in the near-infrared spectrum. That energy is absorbed at the surface first. Once absorbed, it becomes heat that drives temperature rise and internal load.

What matters in real buildings is not just total heat flow. It is the rate at which heat builds and moves inward.

That is thermal diffusivity.

Without it, energy modelling misses the timing and intensity of peak loads, which is exactly what drives energy consumption and discomfort.

What Thermal Diffusivity Actually Changes

Thermal diffusivity combines conductivity, density and specific heat. In simple terms, it describes how quickly a material responds to heat.

High diffusivity means a surface heats up fast and passes that energy inward quickly.

Low diffusivity means the surface resists rapid temperature change, slowing down heat penetration and reducing peak load.

In transient conditions like solar exposure, that difference is critical. Two materials can have similar conductivity but behave completely differently when exposed to real heat.

Surface Behaviour Comes First

Before insulation does anything, heat hits the outer surface.

That surface determines:

  • How much radiation is reflected
  • How much is absorbed
  • How quickly temperature rises
  • How fast that energy moves inward

Most of the industry focuses on reflectance and emissivity. That’s only part of the story.

If heat is absorbed and the material has high diffusivity, it still moves quickly into the structure.

That’s where modelling falls short.

The Testing Problem No One Talks About

This is where things get messy.

Thermal diffusivity numbers are often presented without context, and the test method behind them changes everything.

When a competitor quotes diffusivity using ISO methods such as International Organization for Standardization 22007-2, it is typically measured on polymers or low-conductivity materials.

Those materials naturally slow heat movement. The result is a lower diffusivity value.

On paper, it looks like strong performance.

But it does not represent real-world conditions.

Most buildings and assets are made from steel, aluminium or concrete. These are high conductivity materials where heat moves fast and aggressively.

That is where performance actually matters.

What Real Testing Looks Like

When testing is carried out using standards from ASTM International on a metal substrate, the environment is completely different.

Heat moves quickly. The substrate wants to absorb and transfer energy. There is no buffering effect from low-conductivity materials.

If a coating reduces heat transfer in that environment, it proves something far more valuable:

It is controlling heat at the surface before it enters the structure. That is not a theoretical material property. That is system performance under real load.

Why This Isn’t Apples vs Apples

Comparing ISO diffusivity results on plastic with ASTM-based heat transfer results on metal is not a fair comparison.

It is not even the same problem.

ISO testing shows how a material behaves in isolation under low-conductivity conditions.

ASTM testing on metal shows how a system behaves under high heat load with a conductive substrate.

One is controlled and idealised. The other is closer to reality.

Yet both are often presented side by side as if they mean the same thing.

They don’t.

What Clients Actually Care About

Clients are not buying diffusivity values. They are buying outcomes.

They want to know if the solution:

  • Reduces heat load
  • Lowers surface temperature
  • Cuts heat transfer into the structure
  • Reduces energy use
  • Protects assets and contents

Those outcomes only show up when testing reflects real conditions.

A low diffusivity number from a plastic-based test does not guarantee the same performance on a steel roof or tank.

Where Advanced Coatings Fit

This is where surface-based solutions shift the conversation.

Super Therm® is a multi-ceramic insulation coating designed to control heat at the surface. Applied at around 250 microns dry film thickness, it does not rely on bulk mass to slow heat. It slows the heat at the surface, diffusivity – blocks 99.5% of infrared (ASTM E1269 & ASTM E1461-92): 25°C, 50°C, 75°C, 100°C

It works by:

  • Reflecting a high percentage of solar radiation, including UV
  • Blocking infrared heat before it is absorbed
  • Reducing surface temperature rise
  • Slowing the rate of heat transfer into the substrate

Testing on metal substrates has shown reduced BTU transfer compared to uncoated surfaces. That matters because the metal is constant. The only variable is the coating.

That confirms the mechanism is surface control, not just resistance.

Field results back this up. The City of Adelaide Cool Roof Trial recorded internal temperature reductions of up to 6°C under real conditions.

More detailed performance data can be found here:
https://neotechcoatings.com/super-therm-testing-and-results/

Where Energy Modelling Needs to Go

Modern modelling tools are capable of handling transient conditions, but the industry still defaults to steady-state thinking.

If we want accurate predictions in hot climates, modelling needs to include:

  • Surface heat load
  • Infrared absorption and reflection
  • Thermal diffusivity
  • Peak load timing and reduction

Without this, models underestimate the impact of solar radiation and overestimate the effectiveness of traditional insulation alone.

Diffusivity is Next Generation Insulation

First generation: Make it white. Reflect more sunlight.

Second generation: Add emissivity. Make it thicker. Optimise SRI.

Both improve surface temperature. But neither fully address what matters most: how the surface actually behaves under heat load.

Third generation reality: passive heat load surface behaviour

Final Position

Thermal diffusivity is not a niche metric. It is an essential missing piece.

But more importantly, it needs to be measured and understood in the right context.

ISO 22007-2 diffusivity values on low-conductivity materials can look impressive, but they do not reflect how buildings actually behave.

ASTM E1461-based testing on real substrates shows what happens when heat hits the surface and tries to move inward.

That is the difference between theory and performance.

If you are not measuring how heat behaves on the actual substrate, you are not measuring what matters.

You are measuring numbers, not outcomes.


References

NEOtech Coatings – Super Therm Testing and Results
https://neotechcoatings.com/super-therm-testing-and-results/

Engineering Toolbox – Thermal Diffusivity Explained
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-diffusivity-d_429.html

U.S. Department of Energy – Cool Roof Guidance
https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/cool-roofs

ASTM E1461: Standard Test Method for Thermal Diffusivity of Solids by the Flash Method
https://store.astm.org/e1461-13r22.html

ISO 22007-2 – Determination of Thermal Diffusivity
https://www.iso.org/standard/42957.html


Looking to join one of the world’s leading coatings companies. Contact us if you’re a quality applicator looking for new products and markets!